Legal Opinion

Bockes v. A. McAfee & Son Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1911No. Docket No. 105PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Kalkaska; Lamb, J. Trespass guare clausum fregit by William H. Bockes and Charles E. Mahan against A. McAfee & Son Co. Judgment for plaintiffs. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This is an action of trespass guare clausum fregit brought by the plaintiffs. The attached plat will aid in understanding the situation.

The declaration contained two counts. One was the ordinary count in trespass, and the other count under the statute. The plea was the general issue. This case was tried by the court without a jury. The findings of the trial judge important to mention are as follows:

“ (2) Some time during the fall or summer of 1908, the defendant, A. McAfee & Son Company, a corporation, by its agents and employés, and without any right, title, or *8interest in said land, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Isle Royale Mining Co. v. HertinMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Gates v. ComstockMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Congdon v. BaileyMichigan Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Connor v. McRaeMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Miller v. WykoffMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Weisswasser v. ChernickMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API