Legal Opinion
Panela v. Castile Mining Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided March 31, 1911No. Docket No. 142PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Certiorari to Gogebic; Cooper, J. Case by Jacob Panela against the Castile Mining Company for personal injuries. A judgment overruling a demurrer to a part of plaintiff’s declaration, is reviewed by defendant on writ of certiorari.
1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, C. J.
The plaintiff declared against the defendant in an action on the case, the declaration containing two counts. To the second count the defendant pleaded the general issue. To the first count it demurred and assigned as grounds of demurrer:
“ (1) That said declaration does not state wherein and what part or parts of the hoisting machinery, apparatus, appliances, contrivances, or devices of said defendant, by means of which the plaintiff was to be promptly, expeditiously, and safely hoisted and conveyed through defendant’s shaft or to a place or places of safety, were not reasonably safe, proper,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cristanelli v. Saginaw Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908
3Cited by3 opinions
- Maki v. Mohawk Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Panela v. Castile Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Conradsen v. Osceola Consolidated Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914