Maki v. Mohawk Mining Co.

The plaintiff was employed in the mine of defendant. While so employed he received injuries *499for which this suit was brought. From a verdict and judgment of $2,000 in his favor the case is brought here by writ of error.

The errors relied on are grouped as follows:

“(1) The provisions of Act No. 307, Laws of 1909, permitting so-called cross-examination under certain circumstances are unconstitutional.

“(2) There is no evidence in the record of negligence on the part of the defendant.

“(3) There is no evidence in the record of any failure in the duty of the defendant with reference to inspection.

“(4)…