Legal Opinion

Panela v. Castile Mining Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1913No. Docket No. 63PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Gogebic; Cooper, J. Case by Jacob Panela against the Castile Mining Company for personal injuries. Judgment for defendant on a directed verdict. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.

Plaintiff brought suit for damages for personal injuries received while he was employed by defendant company as a miner in the Eureka mine, operated by it. The result of the trial was a verdict instructed by the court at the close of plaintiff’s ease in favor of the defendant, upon which a judgment was entered. Plaintiff seeks a reversal of this judgment upon the ground that the trial court was in error in directing a verdict against him.

The case has already been before this court, brought here by defendant to review an order overruling a demurrer to the first count of plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Beesley v. F. W. Wheeler & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Kaukola v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Livingstone v. Saginaw Plate Glass Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Cristanelli v. Saginaw Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Orso v. Great Lakes Engineering WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Aho v. Cleveland Cliffs Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Conradsen v. Osceola Consolidated Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API