State v. Tami Marie Southwick
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MELANSON, Judge.
Tami Marie Southwick appeals from her judgment of conviction for possession of methamphetamine. Specifically, she argues that there was insufficient evidence to show that she had knowledge and control of the controlled substances hidden in her vehicle and that the district court committed fundamental error by failing to give a unanimity jury instruction. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
I
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
Southwick was stopped for having an expired vehicle registration. During the initial contact, the officer discovered that the vehicle was registered and insured…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Stromberg v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Schad v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Griffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- State v. PerryIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. Tristum Beeks, IIIdaho Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. CaudillIdaho Court of Appeals · 2024
- State v. EbokosiaIdaho Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. LozaIdaho Court of Appeals · 2025
- State v. Tomas-VelasquezIdaho Court of Appeals · 2021