Legal Opinion

State v. Tristum Beeks, II

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided July 7, 2015No. 42022PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MELANSON, Chief Judge.

Tristum Beeks, II, appeals from his judgment of conviction for felony violation of a no-contact order. He contends that the state committed prosecutorial misconduct during voir dire, direct examination, and closing argument. He also contends that the district court erred in its instructions to the jury. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

A no-contact order was entered against Beeks after he was charged with domestic battery of his fiancée. Beeks violated the no-contact order a few days after the incident and again several months later,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State v. PerryIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. FodgeIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. SeversonIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. Timothy Alan DunlapIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  5. State v. FieldIdaho Supreme Court · 2007

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. AhmedIdaho Supreme Court · 2021
  2. State v. RobertsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2025
  3. State v. RobertsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API