Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. Pinson

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1949No. 3546PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Badt, J.:

Respondent has moved to strike the reporter’s transcript on the ground of late filing. A former motion on different grounds was heretofore denied by this ocurt. State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Pinson, 65 Nev. 510, 199 P.2d 631. Reference is made to the opinion in that case. Appellants object to our consideration of this second motion because of the absence of showing of any reason why the matters were not included in the first motion. They contend that respondent is splitting motions where complete relief could have been granted upon one motion; that its…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dellwo v. PetersenIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
  2. King v. Pony Gold Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Hart v. WalkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. PinsonNevada Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Taylor v. TaylorNevada Supreme Court · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MurrayNevada Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Mikulich v. CarnerNevada Supreme Court · 1951
  3. State v. MurrayNevada Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API