Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Taylor

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1935No. 3107PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Coleman, J.:

On March 28, 1935, respondent filed notice of motion to the effect that the appeal from the judgment be dismissed ; that the appeal from the order denying appellants’ motion for a new trial be dismissed; that the order denying appellants’ motion for a new trial be affirmed; that all portions of the record not being properly a part of a judgment roll be stricken.

The ground for the motion to dismiss the appeal and affirm the order denying the motion for a new trial is that there is not in the bill of exceptions settled by the court a motion for a new trial. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. KesslerMontana Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Shirk v. PalmerNevada Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Brearley v. ArobioNevada Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Brockman v. UllomNevada Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Orleans Hornsilver Mining Co. v. Le Champ D'Or French Gold Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wittenberg v. WittenbergNevada Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Taylor v. TaylorNevada Supreme Court · 1937
  3. State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. PinsonNevada Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Taylor v. TaylorNevada Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Chance v. ArculariusNevada Supreme Court · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API