Legal Opinion

State v. Murray

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1950No. 3538PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Badt, J.:

Defendants, who are the appellants here, were found guilty of grand larceny by a jury in the district court of Mineral County, and have appealed from the judgment and from the order denying their motion for a new trial. They assign error in several particulars, but the third assignment of error embraces numerous rulings of the trial court in the admission and rejection of evidence and the fourth and fifth assignments of error include numerous orders of the trial court in giving the *136jury instructions over the objections of the defendants and in refusing…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Agnew v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CassinelliNevada Supreme Court · 1950
  3. State v. HartleyNevada Supreme Court · 1895
  4. State v. JonesNevada Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Littell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1893

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Deutscher v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State v. ChildersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
  3. Schmeizl v. SchmeizlCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  4. State v. BurttsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Vincze v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API