Legal Opinion

Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Parker

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1900No. 18,268PublishedCited by 27 opinions

From the Hendricks Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.

Action against appellant to recover damages for negligently causing the death of Henry E. Ilurshman. Deinurrer to complaint for want of sufficient facts overruled. Trial, and judgment for appellee.

The gist of the complaint is the charge that appellant negligently constructed a side-track, and ordered the decedent, an engineer, to run his engine over it; and that the .decedent, without fault on his part, was killed by the overturning of the engine as the result of the giving way of the side-track. There is no averment that the decedent, before going upon the side-track, did not have full…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Consolidated Stone Co. v. SummitIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. DuelIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. SandfordIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. CorpsIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. GossettIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Indianapolis & Greenfield Rapid Transit Co. v. ForemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. PowersIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. RitcheyIndiana Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. BarkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1908

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API