Legal Opinion

Bennar v. Central Mausoleum Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 27, 1931No. Appeal, 12PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This appeal is from a judgment entered in favor of defendant, on a sci. fa. sur mechanic’s lien.

Defendant company contracted, under date of February 20, 1929, with Henry E. Curtis, a contractor, for the erection of a mausoleum on the premises of the East Harrisburg Cemetery Company. Curtis entered into a stipulation, filed of record February 21, 1929, that no lien would be filed against the premises or building contracted for, by himself or by any subcontractor. On February 23, 1929, Curtis in writing executed a subcontract with Bennar, the claimant, for part of the work and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Achenbach v. StoddardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  2. Herr v. Moss Cigar Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Grange Nat. Bank, Etc. v. CollmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Lincoln Deposit & Trust Co. v. SankerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Dunham-Bush, Inc. v. Murray's 51 Lanes, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. McCrady-rodgers Co. v. NenoffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. Deets v. FreedSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API