Legal Opinion

Bourd v. Berman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 25, 1948No. Appeals, 46 and 47PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones,

These are appeals by the defendant from judgments entered on a verdict for a minor plaintiff, acting by a legal representative, and for his parents, for damages for injuries suffered by the minor (an eight-year old boy) through the alleged negligence of the defendant. It is presently unnecessary to relate the circumstances attending the accident. The appellant concedes that the case was for the jury both on the question of her negligence and any contributory negligence on the part of the minor who, obviously, was of tender years.

The appellant’s sole complaint is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wilhelm v. UttenweilerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. Allegany Gas Co. v. KempSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Grange Nat. Bank, Etc. v. CollmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Libengood v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  5. Fasick v. ByerlySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Goodheart v. CaseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Roberts v. Fireman's Ins. Co. of NJSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Brunswick Corp. v. Key Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Weaverland Independent School District CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Martin v. Philadelphia Suburban Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API