McNair v. Weikers
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
SHERTZ, Judge:
In the first of these consolidated appeals, Appellants challenge the lower court’s grant of a new trial. The decision of the court en banc rested on two grounds: (1) the trial court abused its discretion in that it improperly refused Appellee’s request to present rebuttal evidence, and (2) the trial court abused its discretion in that it improperly prohibited Appellee from filing a supplemental pretrial statement and from presenting certain expert medical testimony. Appellants contend the court en banc erred in granting a new trial. We disagree and therefore affirm. 1
In the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Schaffer v. LarzelereSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Schacter v. AlbertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Nesbitt v. Erie Coach Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Anthony v. Koppers Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Husak v. Berkel, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Ciccarelli v. Carey Canadian Mines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Day v. Volkswagenwerk AktiengesellschaftSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- McGowan v. University of ScrantonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Richardson v. LaBuzCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Gravinese v. Johns-Manville Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.