Legal Opinion

Day v. Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 19, 1983No. 158PublishedCited by 120 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

Does a state court action against a distributor and a retailer of an allegedly defective motor vehicle survive after an action in a federal court against the manufacturer and the importer has resulted in a final determination that the vehicle was not defective? The trial court held that the state court action was barred by res judicata and collateral estoppel and entered summary judgment in favor of the distributor and retailer. We affirm. Further proceedings in the state court action are barred by principles of collateral estoppel.

Mrs. Nancy V. Day was seriously injured when…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Thompson Coal Co. v. Pike Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Haring v. ProsiseSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Berkebile v. Brantly Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Incollingo v. EwingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Incollingo v. EWINGSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by120 opinions

  1. Deanna Turner v. Crawford Square Apartments Iii, L.P. McCormack Baron Management Services, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  2. Thorsen v. Iron and Glass BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. unempl.ins.rep. Cch 22,077 Harry T. Edmundson v. Borough of Kennett Square Robert F. Goddu Kenneth Roberts Herbert L. Waltz Albert J. McCarthyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  4. Washington Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Little v. v. & G Welding Supply, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1997

115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API