Legal Opinion
Chasteen v. Unisia Jecs Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 5, 2000No. 99-1020PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
In 1997, Injection Research Specialists, Inc. and Pacer Industries, Inc. (collectively, “Injection Research”) 1 filed suit against Arctic Cat, Inc., Arctic Cat Sales, Inc. (collectively, “Arctic Cat”), Suzuki Motor Corp. (“Suzuki”) and UNISIA JECS Corp. (“JECS”) (collectively, the “Defendants”), claiming the Defendants committed trade secret misappropriation and fraud. Spe- eifically, Injection Research alleged the Defendants stole its trade secrets and used them to develop an electronic fuel injection (“EFI”) system for two-cycle snowmobile engines. The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Kathy L. Kaul v. Robert T. Stephan, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Tilton v. Capital Cities/ABC, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. v. HartmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- Ashton-Tate Corp. v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Lincoln v. BNSF Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Schwartz v. Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way EmployesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Fowler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Burnett v. Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Cypress Semiconductor Corp. v. Superior Court of Santa Clara CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.