Legal Opinion

Rugh v. Keystone-Lawrence Transfer & Storage Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 21, 1962No. Appeal, No. 222PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Flood, J.,

Judgment was entered in the court below in favor of the claimant for benefits for the death of her husband under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. The apr pellant contends that the decedent, at the time of the accident, was not its employe but was an independent contractor.

The referee found the following facts which were approved by the Workmen’s Compensation Board and the court below and are fully sustained by the evidence :

“First: That the defendant, Keystone-Lawrence Transfer & Storage Company, entered into a lease agreement with Fred P. Rugh, under which agreement…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gallagher's Estate v. BattleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  2. War Emergency Co-Op. Ass'n v. WidenhouseCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
  3. Turner v. Schumacher Motor Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  4. Diehl v. Keystone Alloys Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Stroud v. ZuzichSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Walton v. Harold M. Kelly, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Walton v. Harold M. Kelly, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Kelly v. Eclipse Motor LineDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1969
  4. Stine v. BorstSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  5. Patterson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API