Walton v. Harold M. Kelly, Inc.
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Crumlish, Jr.,
In this appeal from a decision and order of the Workmen’s Compensation Board of Review, we are called upon to determine the true employer-employee relationship between Lester Walton and the two named defendants. Each named defendant contends that, for the purposes of workmen’s compensation, the other was the employer of Walton.
Walton, a resident of Pennsylvania, was employed by Harold M. Kelly, Inc., as a tractor-trailer operator. On April 8, 1965, Walton, on behalf of Kelly, Inc., entered into an agreement with B & P Motor Express in Baltimore, Maryland, which…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- J. Miller Co. v. MixterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- State ex rel. Marr v. StearnsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- War Emergency Co-Op. Ass'n v. WidenhouseCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
- Vance Trucking Company v. Canal Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1966
- Gibson v. Moore Motor Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Universal Am-Can, Ltd. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- North Penn Transfer, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Toomer v. United Resin Adhesives, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
- Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. DupesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.