Legal Opinion

Walton v. Harold M. Kelly, Inc.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 1, 1972No. Appeal, No. 657 C.D. 1971PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Crumlish, Jr.,

In this appeal from a decision and order of the Workmen’s Compensation Board of Review, we are called upon to determine the true employer-employee relationship between Lester Walton and the two named defendants. Each named defendant contends that, for the purposes of workmen’s compensation, the other was the employer of Walton.

Walton, a resident of Pennsylvania, was employed by Harold M. Kelly, Inc., as a tractor-trailer operator. On April 8, 1965, Walton, on behalf of Kelly, Inc., entered into an agreement with B & P Motor Express in Baltimore, Maryland, which…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. J. Miller Co. v. MixterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. State ex rel. Marr v. StearnsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  3. War Emergency Co-Op. Ass'n v. WidenhouseCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
  4. Vance Trucking Company v. Canal Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1966
  5. Gibson v. Moore Motor Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Universal Am-Can, Ltd. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. North Penn Transfer, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Toomer v. United Resin Adhesives, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
  4. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. DupesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API