Legal Opinion

Stine v. Borst

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 16, 1964No. Appeal, 204PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Ervin, J.,

Kenneth L. Stine, husband of the claimant in this Workmen’s Compensation case, was killed on June 12, 1959 while driving a tractor-trailer unit owned by the defendant, Raymond Borst, and leased to the defendant, Pyramid Industries, Inc. (Pyramid), as a result of an accident which occurred near Monroeville, Ohio, when Stine ran off the road and struck a tree. No other vehicle was involved in the accident.

The sole question in this case is — whose employe was Stine at the time of the accident? The referee found that Stine was the employe of Borst and absolved Pyramid from…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Watkins v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Mature v. AngeloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Hartig v. American Ice Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Kissell v. Motor Age Transit Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  5. Waters v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Greene v. Oliver Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. FeldmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Glens Falls Insurance v. CradlebaughDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Gosha v. City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1982
  5. Brasel v. Quickway, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API