Legal Opinion

Doggett v. Johnson

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1928No. 6,247PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Callaway

This controversy arose out of what was done following the decision of this court in Doggett v. Johnson, 72 Mont. 443, 234 Pac. 252. It will be remembered that in that case we held void an order of the district court made March 11, 1924, appointing a receiver. After the remittitur went down the receiver reported that he had in his hands the sum of $1,826.30. The court allowed Wright, the receiver, $150 as compensation and directed him to pay the remainder, $1,676.30, to the defendant John H. Johnson, or his order. This was upon November 22, 1926.

On December 2, 1926, and while Wright still had…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dunsmoor v. FurstenfeldtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Cavanaugh v. CasselmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Kimball v. Richardson Kimball Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Russell & Co. v. MillettWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Doggett v. JohnsonMontana Supreme Court · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Associated Dermatology & Skin Cancer Clinic of Helena, P.C. v. FitteMontana Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Blackfeet Tribe of Blackfeet Indian Reservation v. Klies Livestock Co.District Court, D. Montana · 1958
  3. Associated Dermatology & Skin Cancer Clinic of Helena, P.C. v. FitteMontana Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API