Legal Opinion

Wieber v. Rollins

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 2, 1988No. OT-88-8PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This cause is before the court on appeal from a judgment of the Ottawa County Court of Common Pleas, wherein that court granted defendant-appellee’s motion for summary judgment.

Plaintiff-appellant, Marcia Wieber, Administratrix of the Estate of Brad Wieber, filed a timely notice of appeal and asserts the following assignment of error:

“The Trial Court Erred As A Matter Of Law In Granting The Defendant’s/Appellee’s Rule 56 Motion For Summary Judgment, Where Reasonable Minds Could Not Come To But One Conclusion Adverse to the Plaintiff/Appellant.”

On August 16,1985, at about 10:00 a.m.,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Williams v. First United Church of ChristOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Light v. Ohio UniversityOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Frewen v. PageMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  5. Elliott v. NagyOhio Supreme Court · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Easterling v. Am. Olean Tile Co., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Wright v. City of HamiltonOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Stiner v. DechantOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Meese v. Ohio Power Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API