Legal Opinion

Stiner v. Dechant

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 18, 1996No. 96CA006329PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dickinson, Judge.

Plaintiffs Kenneth and Kelly Stiner have appealed from an order of the Lorain County Common Pleas Court that granted defendants Herbert Deehant, Thelma Dechant, John Notley, Rebecca Notley, and Carl Kolb summary judgment. Plaintiffs have argued that the trial court (1) incorrectly granted the Dechants and Notleys summary judgment because there was a genuine issue of material fact regarding whether they breached a duty of care they owed to Kenneth Stiner as a licensee on their property, and (2) incorrectly granted Kolb summary judgment because there was a genuine issue of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Simmers v. Bentley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Light v. Ohio UniversityOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Parenti v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Johnson v. Village of New LondonOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Miller v. City of DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Switzerland of Ohio Local School Dist.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Hug v. HakeOhio Court of Appeals · 2026
  3. Tomba v. City of WickliffeLake County Court of Common Pleas · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API