Legal Opinion

Conservatorship of Coombs

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 24, 1998No. A083160PublishedCited by 3 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JONES, P. J.

On June 2, 1998, Mercedita Coombs (appellant) filed a notice of appeal indicating that she sought review of eight judgments/orders (hereafter rulings) of the trial court in a conservatorship proceeding. David F. Coombs, conservator of the person and estate of Guy F. Coombs (respondent), has moved to dismiss the appeal as to five of the eight identified rulings.

Respondent’s motion invites us to revisit the interplay between California Rules of Court, 1 rules 2 and 3, which specify the critical deadlines a litigant must meet to preserve a right to appeal. In the published…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Blue Mountain Development Co. v. CarvilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  3. Passavanti v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. Rojes v. Riverside General HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. JADE K. v. ViguriCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Burgard v. BurgardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  2. Safeco Insurance v. Architeral Facades Unlimited, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. MAIDES v. Ralphs Grocery Co.California Court of Appeal · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API