Legal Opinion
MAIDES v. Ralphs Grocery Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 4, 2000No. D031180PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WORK, Acting P. J.
Michelle Y. Maides and Scott D. Maides appeal a summary judgment in favor of Ralphs Grocery Company. As a matter of first impression in this case where the Maideses filed a notice of intent to move to vacate before judgment was entered, we hold the 60-day period within which an appeal must ordinarily be brought (Cal. Rules of Court, 2 rule 2(a)) cannot be shortened by the provisions in rule 3(b), which pertain to time limits for filing appeals after filing such notices. We conclude the sole purpose of rule 3(b) is to extend appeal time to accommodate motions to vacate…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Committee of Seven Thousand v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- In Re BandmannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Brice v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Lamb v. Holy Cross HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Carpiaux v. Peralta Community College Dist.California Court of Appeal · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Silverbrand v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Matera v. McLeodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Volkswagen of America, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Annette F. v. Sharon S.California Court of Appeal · 2005