Pearl Grange Fruit Exchange, Inc. v. Shembarger
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtT. G. Kavanagh, J.
After obtaining a judgment against appellant’s insured for damages arising out of an automobile accident, plaintiff-appellee brought this garnishment action which was tried by the court without a jury. Plaintiff had provided a company-car for its employee Maurice Shembarger, one of the principal defendants, for use in company business and left it with him for convenience during the off season, when the employee was not working for plaintiff. The defendant’s wife, the other principal defendant, when their own car would not start, used the company car and was involved in an accident. Their own…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Leonard v. HeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Schmidt v. RobinetMichigan Court of Appeals · 1965
3Cited by3 opinions
- Holt v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Fister v. HenschelMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- Holt v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1986