Legal Opinion

Fister v. Henschel

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 25, 1999No. Docket 2,099PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFitzgerald, P. J.

On March 18, 1964, an “exclusive sale listing agreement” was signed granting plaintiff exclusive sales rights on property belonging to defendants in Berrien county and then being developed into a subdivision. The agreement granted such rights for a period of 180 days, with automatic 30-day extensions for each lot sold during the term of the agreement. The commission rates to he received by plaintiff and the services he was to perform were set forth in the agreement.

Tests made after entering the agreement disclosed a drainage problem on the property requiring the installation of a drain field…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Allison v. ChandlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Mueller v. Bethesda Mineral Spring Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Isbell v. Anderson Carriage Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Leonard v. BeaudryMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Hitchcock v. Supreme Tent of Knights of the Maccabees of the WorldMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Allen v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Lorenz Supply Co. v. American Standard, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Goodwin, Inc. v. ORSON E. COE PONTIAC, INC.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Lake Louise Christian Community v. Township of HudsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. People v. CampbellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API