Legal Opinion

Dublin Eye Associates, P.C. v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided July 12, 2013No. Civil Action No. 5:11-CV-128-KSFPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

KARL S. FORESTER, Senior District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ motion for summary judgment on the ground that Plaintiffs’ claims are barred by the statute of limitations. While Plaintiffs might have had some legitimate claims if they had been timely raised, the delay in bringing their claims is fatal. For the reasons discussed below, the motion will be granted.

I. BACKGROUND

Dublin Eye Associates, P.C. (“DEA”) established a pension plan (“Plan”) for its principals and employees in 1980. The original Plan Trustees were DEA’s doctors, Roger D. Smith…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Cataldo v. United States Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  5. Merck & Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Catlin Specially Insurance v. American Superconductor Corp.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API