Dublin Eye Associates, P.C. v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KARL S. FORESTER, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ motion for summary judgment on the ground that Plaintiffs’ claims are barred by the statute of limitations. While Plaintiffs might have had some legitimate claims if they had been timely raised, the delay in bringing their claims is fatal. For the reasons discussed below, the motion will be granted.
I. BACKGROUND
Dublin Eye Associates, P.C. (“DEA”) established a pension plan (“Plan”) for its principals and employees in 1980. The original Plan Trustees were DEA’s doctors, Roger D. Smith…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Cataldo v. United States Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Merck & Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Catlin Specially Insurance v. American Superconductor Corp.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2014