Catlin Specially Insurance v. American Superconductor Corp.

Billings, Thomas R, J.

The plaintiff (“Catlin”) issued two Professional and Pollution Legal Liabiliiy Insurance Policies in consecutive years to the defendants (“AMSC” and its subsidiary, “Windtec”). In this action, it seeks a declaration that the insureds were late in reporting a claim made against them during the first policy period and that for this and other, unrelated reasons, there is no coverage (Counts II and III); that Catlin is entitled to rescind the second (2011) policy (Count I); and that Catlin is entitled to recoup amounts it has paid to defend the claim (Count IV). Before me…