Weinstock v. Ott
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
STATON, Judge.
A jury found for the estate of Norma Ott (Ott) in a medical malpractice action against Dr. Adolph Weinstock, M.D. Ott’s suit alleged that Dr. Weinstock breached his duty to refer Norma for a diagnostic consultation when he was unable to discover the cause of her disorder. The issues Dr. Weinstock raises on appeal are restated as follows:
I.Should Ott’s expert medical witness have been allowed to answer a hypothetical question which assumed some facts which were never put into evidence?
II.Was Ott’s expert medical witness familiar with the standard of care in a locality similar to…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. v. ChapmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Guy v. SCHULDTIndiana Supreme Court · 1956
- Sinz v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Bassett v. GlockIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
- Epps v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Autocephalous Greek-Orthodox Church of Cyprus and the Republic of Cyprus v. Goldberg and Feldman Fine Arts, Inc., and Peg GoldbergCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Kern Ex Rel. Kern v. St. Joseph Hospital, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
- Spoljaric v. PanganIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Matter of Adoption of TRMIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
- Durphy v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Mid-Atlantic States, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.