Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Cantres

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 22, 1989PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.

A District Court judge found probable cause on a complaint alleging that the defendant “did conspire with Philip A. DeMarco to violate the provisions of G. L. c. 94C [Controlled Substances Act], to wit: Distribution of Heroin, in violation of G. L. c. 94C, § 40.” A grand jury subsequently indicted the defendant. The indictment stated that, “Jose Cantres did conspire with Philip DeMarco to violate the Controlled Substance Act.” The specific violation of the Controlled Substances Act contemplated by the conspiracy was not specified. After discovery, including the Commonwealth’s furnishing the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LatimoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Iannelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Commonwealth v. Beneficial Finance CompanyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  4. Commonwealth v. BoydMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  5. Attorney General v. TuftsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. United States v. Gennaro J. Angiulo, Donato F. Angiulo, Samuel S. Granito, Francesco J. Angiulo and Michele A. AngiuloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  2. State v. ChildsOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Leibovich v. AntonellisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  4. Commonwealth v. RiveraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  5. Commonwealth v. FrazierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API