Legal Opinion

Mead v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 23, 2007No. 03A01-0703-CR-108PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Appellant-Defendant, Billy R. Mead, Jr. (Mead), appeals his conviction for attempted manufacturing of methamphetamine, a Class B felony, Ind.Code §§ 35-48-4-1.1 and 35-41-5-1.

We affirm.

ISSUES

Mead raises one issue on appeal, which we restate as: Whether the trial court properly sentenced him.

In addition, the State raises one issue on cross-appeal, which we restate as: Whether the trial court erred in granting Mead’s Petition to File a Belated Notice of Appeal.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In January 2002, the Columbus Police Department received a report…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Buchanan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Collins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Gutermuth v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Moshenek v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. St. Clair v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Ricks v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. David Streeter v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. Michael Phelps v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Richard Dodd v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API