Legal Opinion

Moshenek v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 2007No. 42S04-0706-PC-244PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOEHM, Justice.

We hold that a trial court’s ruling on a petition for permission to seek relief under Post-Conviction Rule 2 should be affirmed unless it was based on an error of law or a clearly erroneous factual determination. Moreover, if the trial court did not advise a defendant of the right to appeal the sentence in an “open plea,” that may well suffice to meet the lack of fault requirement under Posh-Conviction Rule 2 depending on other evidence, but the defendant must make some additional showing to establish diligence.

Factual and Procedural Background

On August 28, 1988, twenty-one…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Fisher v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Houser v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Collins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Plymale v. UprightIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Lee v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Cooper v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Hill v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Bowling v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Sholes v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2008

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API