Moshenek v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BOEHM, Justice.
We hold that a trial court’s ruling on a petition for permission to seek relief under Post-Conviction Rule 2 should be affirmed unless it was based on an error of law or a clearly erroneous factual determination. Moreover, if the trial court did not advise a defendant of the right to appeal the sentence in an “open plea,” that may well suffice to meet the lack of fault requirement under Posh-Conviction Rule 2 depending on other evidence, but the defendant must make some additional showing to establish diligence.
Factual and Procedural Background
On August 28, 1988, twenty-one…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Fisher v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
- Houser v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Collins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
- Plymale v. UprightIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Lee v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
- Cooper v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
- Hill v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
- Bowling v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Sholes v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.