Legal Opinion

Gutermuth v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 2007No. 10S01-0608-CR-306PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOEHM, Justice.

Post-Conviction Rule 2 permits belated appeals of criminal convictions and sentences under some circumstances. We hold that this belated appeal of a sentence entered before a new constitutional rule of criminal procedure was announced is not governed by the new rule. Specifically, belated appeals of sentences entered before Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004) are not subject to the holding in that case.

Factual and Procedural Background

On January 7, 1997, Warren Charles Gutermuth pleaded guilty to three counts of class C felony child…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Rogers v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Harris v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Moshenek v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Robertson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Mosley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2009

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API