Legal Opinion

State v. . Jones

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 18, 1946PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

In the court below counsel for defendant duly excepted to the refusal of the court to dismiss the action as in case of nonsuit. In the case on appeal these exceptions are the basis of an assignment of error. However, counsel employed to prosecute the appeal to this Court inadvertently failed to bring them forward or discuss them in their brief. They are deemed to he abandoned. (Rule 28.) Even so, they direct our attention to a fatal defect in the jurisdiction of the court below, of which we must take notice. Shepard v. Leonard, 223 N. C., 110, 25 S. E. (2d), 445.

Bigamy as defined by G. S.,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. . LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  2. State v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  3. Shepard v. . LeonardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. State v. . HerronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  5. State v. . McNeillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. State v. BatdorfSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. State v. DammonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. Conrad v. ConradSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. State v. ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API