Legal Opinion

Sharon v. Hayden

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1990No. 90-405PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sheehy

Defendants Archie D. Hayden, Glenn W. Hayden, and Dan C. Hill appeal from an order of the Fifth Judicial District Court, Beaverhead County, denying attorney fees. We reverse.

The single issue on this appeal is whether the defendants are entitled to attorney fees under § 70-17-112(5), MCA.

The plaintiff Richard L. Sharon brought this action in District Court to enjoin the defendants, owners of a ditch easement through his property from allegedly unreasonably increasing the burden on his servient tenement by their use of their easement and for damages for their unreasonable use of the ditch…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Laden v. AtkesonMontana Supreme Court · 1941

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Rieman v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Engel v. GamppMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Kephart v. PortmannMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Public Lands Access Ass'n v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Espy v. QuinlanMontana Supreme Court · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API