Legal Opinion

Kephart v. Portmann

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1993No. 92-454PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray

A. Evans Kephart and the Estate of John W. Kephart, Jr., (Kepharts) appeal from a judgment of the Eighteenth Judicial District Court, Gallatin County, determining that Martin and Helen Portmann (Portmanns) possess a ditch easement over and across the Kepharts’ property. The Portmanns cross-appeal the order of the District Court denying them costs and attorney’s fees associated with their defense of this action. We affirm in part and reverse in part. We address the following issues:

1. Did the District Court err in concluding that the Portmanns have a ditch easement over and across the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Steer, Inc. v. Department of RevenueMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Dagel v. City of Great FallsMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Sharon v. HaydenMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Rudio v. Yellowstone Merchandising Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Rath v. St. Labre Indian SchoolMontana Supreme Court · 1991

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Bruner v. Yellowstone CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. MooreMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Wareing v. SchreckendgustMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Byrum v. AndrenMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Musselshell Ranch Company v. Seidel-JoukovaMontana Supreme Court · 2011

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API