Legal Opinion
Itochu Building Products v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 19, 2013No. 2013-1044PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TARANTO, Circuit Judge.
Itochu Building Products asked the United States Department of Commerce to act under 19 U.S.C. § 1675(b) to revoke part of an antidumping-duty order applicable to imported steel nails. Before Commerce issued its preliminary determination to do so, Itochu submitted comments, met with Commerce officials, and provided legal authority to urge that the requested partial revocation take effect at an early specified date. Commerce rejected that position in its preliminary ruling, saying that a later date would apply, and generally invited interested parties to comment. Itochu…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McCarthy v. MadiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Corus Staal BV v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Mittal Steel Point Lisas Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Agro Dutch Industries Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Bendure v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Xinjiamei Furniture (Zhangzhou) Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
- Blue Field (Sichuan) Food Industrial Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
- JBF RAK LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
- Weishan Hongda Aquatic Food Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Beijing Tianhai Industry Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.