Legal Opinion
Agilent Technologies v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided September 1, 2017No. Slip Op. 17-119; Court 16-00183PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
Choe-Groves, Judge:
Plaintiff Agilent Technologies, Inc. (“Agilent” or “Plaintiff’) is a manüfacturer of electronic and bio-analytical measurement instruments who brought this action challenging the scope ruling on Agilent’s mass filter radiator (“MFR”) issued by the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Department” or “Commerce”). See Summons, Sept. 14, 2016, ECF No. 1; Compl., Oct. 5, 2016, ECF No. 8. Commerce determined that the MFR is covered by the scope of the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on aluminum extrusions from the People’s Republic of China (“China”). See…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Novosteel Sa v. United States, and Bethlehem Steel Corporation and U.S. Steel Group, a Unit of Usx Corporation (Now Known as United States Steel Llc)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- NMB Singapore Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Duferco Steel, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Agilent Techs. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
- IPG Photonics Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2026