Benson v. Goble
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
AMUNDSON, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Jimmy Ray Benson appeals the trial court’s decision granting summary judgment in favor of employer, Tescom Corporation. The trial court determined the exclusive remedy of workers’ compensation barred Benson’s tort-based claims. Furthermore, the trial court determined Benson failed to allege facts sufficient to fall within intentional tort exception to the exclusivity provision. We affirm.
FACTS
[¶ 2.] Jimmy Ray Benson began working for Tescom Corporation in Watertown, South Dakota, in November 1981. In June 1991, Benson was transferred to the metal finishing department…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Taggart v. Ford Motor Credit Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Waddell v. Dewey County BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Lamp v. First National Bank of GarretsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- VerBouwens v. Hamm Wood ProductsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- Baker v. Wendy's of Montana, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Fryer v. KranzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Daktronics, Inc. v. McAfeeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Richard v. Washburn Public SchoolsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Bender v. Dakota Resorts Management Group, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Ruschenberg v. EliasonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.