Legal Opinion

Benson v. Goble

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1999No. NonePublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMUNDSON, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Jimmy Ray Benson appeals the trial court’s decision granting summary judgment in favor of employer, Tescom Corporation. The trial court determined the exclusive remedy of workers’ compensation barred Benson’s tort-based claims. Furthermore, the trial court determined Benson failed to allege facts sufficient to fall within intentional tort exception to the exclusivity provision. We affirm.

FACTS

[¶ 2.] Jimmy Ray Benson began working for Tescom Corporation in Watertown, South Dakota, in November 1981. In June 1991, Benson was transferred to the metal finishing department…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Taggart v. Ford Motor Credit Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Waddell v. Dewey County BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Lamp v. First National Bank of GarretsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. VerBouwens v. Hamm Wood ProductsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Baker v. Wendy's of Montana, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Fryer v. KranzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Daktronics, Inc. v. McAfeeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Richard v. Washburn Public SchoolsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Bender v. Dakota Resorts Management Group, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Ruschenberg v. EliasonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API