Legal Opinion

Ruschenberg v. Eliason

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 2014No. 26682PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEVERSON, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Megan Ruschenberg, Jessica Cornelius, and Heather Rensch, collectively referred to as Appellants, appeal the circuit court’s denial of Appellants’ motion in limine to exclude evidence of Ruschen-berg’s abortion, Appellants’ motion for mistrial based upon certain statements made by a witness at trial, and Appellants’ proposed jury instructions regarding the “proxy rule” or “alter ego rule.” 1 We affirm.

Background

[¶ 2.] In 2005, David Eliason and Keith Johnson formed Annabelle’s Adult Super Center of South Dakota, LLC (Annabelle’s) in Sioux Falls, South Dakota. In 2007,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Margaret NICHOLS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMERICAN NATIONAL INSURANCE CO., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
  2. Sander v. Geib, Elston, Frost Professional Ass'nSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. MattsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Hawkins v. PetersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Supreme Pork, Inc. v. Master Blaster, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Knecht v. EvridgeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Stabler v. First State Bank of RoscoeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Sedlacek v. Prussman Contracting, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Repp v. Van SomerenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  5. St. John v. PetersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API