Ruschenberg v. Eliason
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SEVERSON, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Megan Ruschenberg, Jessica Cornelius, and Heather Rensch, collectively referred to as Appellants, appeal the circuit court’s denial of Appellants’ motion in limine to exclude evidence of Ruschen-berg’s abortion, Appellants’ motion for mistrial based upon certain statements made by a witness at trial, and Appellants’ proposed jury instructions regarding the “proxy rule” or “alter ego rule.” 1 We affirm.
Background
[¶ 2.] In 2005, David Eliason and Keith Johnson formed Annabelle’s Adult Super Center of South Dakota, LLC (Annabelle’s) in Sioux Falls, South Dakota. In 2007,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Margaret NICHOLS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMERICAN NATIONAL INSURANCE CO., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Sander v. Geib, Elston, Frost Professional Ass'nSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. MattsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Hawkins v. PetersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Supreme Pork, Inc. v. Master Blaster, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Knecht v. EvridgeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- Stabler v. First State Bank of RoscoeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Sedlacek v. Prussman Contracting, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- Repp v. Van SomerenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- St. John v. PetersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.