Legal Opinion
Mitsubishi Goshi Kaisha v. Carstens Packing Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided August 26, 1921No. 16422PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Appeal from an order of the superior court for King county, Frater, J., entered February 19, 1920, denying a motion to vacate a judgment entered upon an award of arbitrators, after a hearing before the court.
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
On July 25, 1919, the respondent, Mitsubishi Goshi Kaisha, contracted to sell to the appellant, Oarstens Packing Company, some three hundred barrels of China refined edible cottonseed oil, the oil to be shipped from the Orient in August or September following the date of the contract. The contract contained the following provision:
“Any dispute arising under this contract shall be settled by arbitration of M. J. Falkenburg & Company, upon the immediate demand on the part of either the seller or the buyer; the decision of the arbitrator shall be final for both parties.”
The oil was delivered…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dickie Manufacturing Co. v. Sound Construction & Engineering Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
- Surber v. KittengerWashington Supreme Court · 1893
- Tacoma Railway & Motor Co. v. CummingsWashington Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by3 opinions
- Frey & Horgan Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Peterson v. Granger Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1926
- Shumate v. AshleyWashington Supreme Court · 1955