Legal Opinion

Tacoma Railway & Motor Co. v. Cummings

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1892No. 667PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County.

1Opinion of the Court

*207The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoyt, J.

This was a proceeding under chapter 13, title vir, of the Code of Procedure, by which appellant and respondent agreed to an arbitration of the differences between them. The arbitrators heard the controversy, and a majority of them made out an award which was duly filed in court, as required by § 426. Exceptions thereto were duly filed by the respondent and upon a hearing thereof the award was set aside by the court. From such order this appeal has been prosecuted. Respondent moves to dismiss, on the ground that the order appealed from is not…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dickie Manufacturing Co. v. Sound Construction & Engineering Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. State Ex Rel. Fancher v. EverettWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Fisher Flouring Mills Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
  4. Mitsubishi Goshi Kaisha v. Carstens Packing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Klock Produce Co. v. RobertsonWashington Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API