Legal Opinion

Cahill-Swift Mfg. Co. v. Sayer

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 3, 1918No. 9389PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error from Superior Court, Muskogee County; Hal C. Thurman, Judge. Action by the Cahill-Swift Manufacturing •Company and others against the Baltimore Investment Company and Vade N. Sayer. Judgment for plaintiffs for foreclosure of mechanics’ lien on leasehold interest and adjudging it inferior to lessor’s lien under a lease, and plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtOwen, J.

This action was brought by Cahill-Swift Manufacturing Company against the Baltimore -Investment Company to recover for material furnished in the erection of a building, and to foreclose a material-mans’ lien. The defendant Sayer was made a party to the action because he owned the fee in the land on which the building was erected. He leased the premises to the investment company for a period of 99 years. The lease, in addition to an annual rental, provided for the erection of a building at the expense of the lessee, and also for the payment by the lessee of all taxes and other charges against…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Walker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Fourth Street Bank of Philadelphia v. YardleySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Ketchum v. St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Daniel v. TolonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Coder v. McPhersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Gentry-Bowers Lumber Co. v. HamillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Deka Development Co. v. FoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. Stowers v. WheatCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
  4. T. J. Stewart Lumber Co. v. DerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  5. Aldridge v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API