Heck v. Heck
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is an appeal from an order adjudging plaintiff in contempt of court, ordering him to pay Rose Heck (whom we will refer to as the defendant) $250 per month for her support and maintenance during the pendency of the action, to pay to her attorneys $300 for their services rendered in representing her on his motion for new trial in the divorce action, and $1,000 for their services in representing her on his appeal from the interlocutory judgment, and the sum of $250 on account of the cost of a clerk’s transcript and reporter’s transcript and of briefs on appeal. No question is raised as to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Heck v. HeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Farrar v. FarrarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Westphal v. WestphalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sigesmund v. SigesmundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Zundel v. ZundelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
- Travis v. TravisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Larsen v. LarsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Cohen v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.