Legal Opinion

Zundel v. Zundel

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1966No. 8353PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERICKSTAD, Judge.

At the time of the oral argument in .the case of Zundel v. Zundel, N.D., 146 N.W.2d 896, a decision rendered by this court on November 21, 1966, the motion of the plaintiff, Luella M. Zundel, for allowance of attorney’s fees on appeal to the Supreme Court was also heard. The pertinent part of the motion reads as follows:

Comes now James R. Jungroth, of the law firm of Mackenzie & Jungroth, Jamestown, North Dakota, the attorney for Luella M. Zundel, the Plaintiff in the above captioned case, and moves that the North Dakota Supreme Court assess Plaintiff’s attorney fees against…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Fischer v. FischerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Bryant v. BryantNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Falk v. FalkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Westphal v. WestphalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Farrar v. FarrarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Routledge v. RoutledgeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Keig v. KeigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Sanford v. SanfordNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Orwick v. OrwickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Halla v. HallaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API