Legal Opinion

Westphal v. Westphal

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 7, 1932No. Docket No. 8198PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, J., pro tem.

The parties to this action are the same as in the case of Westphal v. Westphal, ante, p. 379 [10 Pac. (2d) 119], this day decided. The present appeal is from an order directing defendant Adolph R. Westphal to pay plaintiff certain sums of money to defray counsel fees and costs of suit. The order appealed from was made after answer and cross-complaint by defendant. Prior to the making of the order in the present appeal the court had made an order directing the payment of a monthly allowance from which order defendant Adolph R. Westphal had appealed. The order here under…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Westphal v. WestphalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. Meyer v. MeyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Primm v. PrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Heck v. HeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. Warner v. WarnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Sigesmund v. SigesmundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Fallon v. FallonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API