Legal Opinion
Foster v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided June 23, 1997No. 95-70501PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
EDMUNDS, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on cross motions for summary judgment. Defendant filed its motion on April 15, 1997, claiming that all of Plaintiffs state law claims are preempted by ERISA. Plaintiff concedes that most of his state law claims are preempted. However, he seeks summary judgment on his claim under the Nonprofit Health Care Corporation Reform Act, Michigan Handicapper’s Civil Rights Act, and in the alternative, under ERISA. For…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hollaway v. UNUM Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Sluiter v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of MichiganDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
- Geissal v. Moore Medical Corp.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2001
- Graf v. Daimler Chrysler Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
- Hollaway v. UNUM Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.