Legal Opinion

Graf v. Daimler Chrysler Corp.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided February 19, 2002No. 01-71281PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

BORMAN, District Judge.

Before the Court is Defendant Dadmler-Chrysler’s motion for summary judgment (Docket Entry # 8). The Court heard oral argument on this motion on February 13, 2002. Upon consideration of the motion, the submissions of the parties, and the applicable law, the Court will GRANT Defendant’s motion.

J. BACKGROUND

This case is an employment dispute between Plaintiff, Michael Graf, and Defendant DaimlerChrysler Corp. Plaintiff is a Michigan resident; Defendant is a Michigan corporation. 1 Plaintiff began working at…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ennis-White v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2024
  2. Huisjack v. Medco Health Solutions, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API