Legal Opinion

First Commercial Title, Inc. v. Holmes

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1976No. 8202PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Zenoff, J.:

We are asked to reject a “due-on-sale” clause in a deed of trust as an unreasonable restraint on alienation. The clause in question appears in a deed of trust executed in conjunction with the sale of certain real property located in Reno, Nevada. It provides:

“In the event that Trustor shall sell or contract to sell the parcel of land hereby encumbered without first obtaining the written consent of Beneficiary, the balance of principal and interest that shall then remain unpaid on the obligation secured by this Deed of Trust shall forthwith become due and payable…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. La Sala v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Coast Bank v. MinderhoutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Tucker v. Lassen Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Baker v. Loves Park Savings & Loan Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Malouff v. Midland Federal Savings and Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Occidental Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Venco PartnershipNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Continental Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. FetterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  3. Olean v. TregliaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  4. Williams v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of ArlingtonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
  5. Barry M. Dechtman, Inc. v. Sidpaul Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1982

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API