Legal Opinion

Andrews v. De Lorm

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 18, 1929No. Docket No. 53PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, J.

This is an action in claim and delivery for the possession of an automobile which was purchased by the defendant De Lorm from the plaintiffs, under a conditional sale contract entered into by the parties in Yakima County, Washington, on June 19, 1925. The automobile in question was delivered to De Lorm when the contract was signed. The contract provides for a purchase price of $1164, acknowledges receipt of $450 down payment, and provides that the balance of $714 shall be payable, $400 on the first day of November, 1925, and $314 on the first day of March, 1926. The contract further provides…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Harding v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Moore v. BorgfeldtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. White v. SchaderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Winchester v. WinchesterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Royer v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bullock v. YoungDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1955
  2. Hougham v. RowlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API