Legal Opinion

Platnauer v. Board of Supervisors

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 21, 1924No. Civ. No. 2773PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.

Plaintiff was granted a peremptory writ of mandate directing the defendants to appoint a justice of the peace for the city of Sacramento. The defendants have appealed.

Plaintiff alleged that he is a taxpayer and a qualified elector of the city of Sacramento; that for more than twenty years he has been admitted to -practice law in the state of California; that he presented and filed a petition, signed by taxpayers and electors of the city of Sacramento, requesting defendants to appoint him justice of the peace of said city, and that plaintiff demanded of defendants that they appoint some…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Conn v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  2. Wampler v. State ex rel. AlexanderIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Graham v. Mayor & Bd. of Trs. of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Frederick v. City of San Luis ObispoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Commonwealth v. LivingstonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hollman v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Klose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. Kenyon v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. In Re RomeroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  5. La Mar v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API